Stage-dependent biotic interactions may not be important for stochastic competitive dynamics with little variation in stage structure

Avatar
Poster
Voice is AI-generated
Connected to paperThis paper is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review

Stage-dependent biotic interactions may not be important for stochastic competitive dynamics with little variation in stage structure

Authors

Lee, J. Y.; Blonder, B.; Ray, C. A.; Hernandez, C.; Salguero-Gomez, R.

Abstract

1. Stage-dependent interactions, in which different life cycle stages (e.g., juveniles, adults) exert different per-capita competitive effects, are widespread across ecological communities. However, whether explicitly accounting for such ontogenetic variation improves forecasts of stochastic community dynamics remains unclear. We tested how the strength of stage dependence and species life-history strategy influence the predictive accuracy of community models that either include or ignore stage-specific interactions. 2. We constructed stochastic two-species competition models using stage-structured matrix population models spanning five virtual life histories along the fast-slow continuum. Density dependence was imposed separately on juvenile survival, adult survival, progression, retrogression, or fertility, and the strength of stage dependence varied from adult-driven to juvenile-driven competition. We then fitted deterministic projection models with and without stage-dependent interaction terms to simulated time series and quantified predictive performance over 100 time-step forecasts using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). 3. Increasing stage dependence consistently reduced the predictive accuracy of models that ignored stage structure. However, absolute prediction errors remained small across all scenarios (MAPE < 0.7%), even under strong stage dependence. The influence of life-history strategy depended on which vital rate was density dependent: when juvenile survival was density dependent, faster life histories showed larger errors; when progression, retrogression, or fertility were density dependent, slower life histories exhibited greater errors; and when adult survival was density dependent, no consistent life-history effect emerged. Across simulations, temporal variation in population structure was low (coefficient of variation < 0.036), and prediction error was strongly associated with the magnitude of structural fluctuations rather than life-history pace per se. 4. Synthesis. Stage-dependent interactions can, in principle, alter stochastic competitive dynamics, but their practical importance for ecological forecasting depends on the extent to which population stage structure fluctuates through time. When environmental stochasticity dominates and stage structure remains near equilibrium, simpler models that ignore stage dependence provide robust approximations of community dynamics. Our results identify conditions under which demographic detail is necessary for forecasting and highlight the central role of structural variability in linking life-history strategy to community-level dynamics.

Follow Us on

0 comments

Add comment